Which of the following is NOT a valid claim against the Fund?

The correct answer is based on the understanding of what constitutes a valid claim against the Fund. The purpose of the Fund is to provide financial relief to consumers who have suffered losses due to specific types of actions by a dealer. Claims typically arise from serious issues such as misrepresentation, service defects, or financial insolvency of the dealer, all of which affect the consumer’s financial investment and trust.

Customer dissatisfaction, while a legitimate sentiment regarding the service or product received, does not typically qualify as a valid claim against the Fund. The Fund is designed to address substantial issues that directly impact a consumer's rights or financial well-being—not feelings of dissatisfaction or disappointment that may arise from subjective experiences. Therefore, customer dissatisfaction does not meet the threshold necessary for a claim against the Fund.